Radioactivity levels in the marine environment along the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Qatar

A study on 137Cs, 40K, 226Ra, 228Ra, and 238U was carried out along the EEZ of Qatar. Results serve as the ﬁrst ever baseline data. The level of 137Cs (mean value 1.6 ± 0.4 Bq m-3) in water ﬁlters was found to be in the same order of magnitude as reported by others in worldwide marine radioactivity studies. Results are also in agreement with values reported from other Gulf regions. The computed values of sediment–water distribution coefﬁcients Kd, are lower than the values given by IAEA. Measurements were carried out for bottom sediments, biota samples like ﬁsh, oyster, sponge, seashell, mangrove, crab, shrimp, starﬁsh, dugong and algae. The ‘concentration factors’ reported for biota samples are below the levels published by IAEA and cause no signiﬁcant impact on human health for seafood consumers in Qatar.

View on MARIS:

Seawwater: https://maris.iaea.org/explore/type/1/ref/403
Biota: https://maris.iaea.org/explore/type/2/ref/403

Last Update: July 2, 2024, 9:15 AM (UTC+00:00)

Contact dataset maintainer

Dataset Info

Radioactivity levels in the marine environment along the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Qatar

Followers: 0

License

IAEA Terms of Use

Openness

0 out of 5

Field	Value
Source	https://www.zotero.org/groups/2432820/maris/items/H8YTRK26
Author	Al-Qaradawi, Ilham; Abdel-Moati, Mohamed; Al-Yafei, Mohsin Al-Ansi; Al-Ansari, Ebrahim; Al-Maslamani, Ibrahim; Holmn, Elis; Al-Shaikh, Ismail; Mauring, Alexander; Pinto, Primal V.; Abdulmalki, Dana; Amir, Amina; Miller, Mark; Yigiterhan, Oguz; Persson, Bertil;
Maintainer	MARIS
Version	1.0
Last Updated	July 2, 2024, 9:15 AM (UTC+00:00)
Created	September 15, 2023, 2:48 PM (UTC+00:00)

Disclaimer

The IAEA makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information. The mention of names of specific companies or equipment does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.